larissa: (Default)
[personal profile] larissa

Title:
Put plurk.com on the whitelist for embeds

Area:
Entries

Summary:
Allow embeds from plurk.com on entries and/or profiles.

Description:
I run a roleplaying game here on Dreamwidth, but much of my playerbase uses <a href="http://plurk.com">Plurk</a> for OOC contact. As such, we have a mod account on Plurk to supplement posts in our OOC community for player information. However, not all players have or use Plurk. While we strive to put everything on the OOC community, occasionally things are posted on Plurk that they might not see. Plurk has a built-in widget for iframe embeds; if these are added to the whitelist we could post it here on Dreamwidth.

Poll #12198 Put plurk.com on the whitelist for embeds
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 74


This suggestion:

View Answers

Should be implemented as-is.
47 (63.5%)

Should be implemented with changes. (please comment)
0 (0.0%)

Shouldn't be implemented.
1 (1.4%)

(I have no opinion)
26 (35.1%)

(Other: please comment)
0 (0.0%)

[personal profile] chagrined

Title:
Remove unnecessary whitespace from embedded objects

Area:
Entries

Summary:
Currently Dreamwidth adds an extra 50 pixels of blank space to embedded objects in entries to avoid problems with nesting iframes. I want to remove that extra whitespace by fixing the iframe style instead so that the nesting does not cause problems. This will give users more control over entry flow/layout.

Description:
Currently Dreamwidth adds an extra 50 pixels of blank space to embedded objects in entries. I assume this was done because if a user embeds an iframe object in an entry, the Dreamwidth code puts that iframe inside another iframe, and then if the two iframes are the same size, you get scroll bars because the body tag in the outer iframe has a margin of 8px around it (in my browser; other browsers may add other margin sizes). Thus, someone wrote some code to add an extra 50px to the width and height of the outer iframe object.

Unfortunately, this leads to an extra 42px of whitespace below the embedded object (in addition to the 8px of whitespace above and to the left and right). Visually this looks like a bunch of extra line breaks under an embedded object, and makes it frustrating when one is, for example, trying to add text after that object (as an explanation/comment, etc.), because it will show up several lines below. It makes it harder for users to control the visual layout of their own entry because there is no way to get rid of this unnecessary whitespace.

My solution is a patch I have already successfully tested out on my Dreamhack account. It will remove the extra 50 pixels of blank space. Instead, the outer iframe's body tag will be given a style with a margin/padding/border of 0. Then both iframes can have the same height/width. There won't be problems with scrollbars and there won't be lots of unneeded whitespace. As with an image or anything else that can be inserted in a Dreamwidth entry, users will be able to control how much space they want around embedded objects.

Poll #12194 Remove unnecessary whitespace from embedded objects
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 48


This suggestion:

View Answers

Should be implemented as-is.
30 (62.5%)

Should be implemented with changes. (please comment)
0 (0.0%)

Shouldn't be implemented.
0 (0.0%)

(I have no opinion)
18 (37.5%)

(Other: please comment)
0 (0.0%)

emceeaich: A close-up of a pair of cats-eye glasses (Default)
[personal profile] emceeaich

Title:
Enable Embedding GitHub Gists as Media in Posts

Area:
posting, media

Summary:
Enable adding GitHub Gists, which are embedded as scripts, in posts, via the 'add media' option so that DW users can post short blocks of formatted source code for discussion and review.

Description:
Gists are text files hosted on GitHub enabling developers to post short snippets of code for review and comment.

GitHub provides a way to embed a gist on a site, as a script file:

&lt;script src="https://gist.github.com/3290622.js?file=foo.js"&gt;&lt;/script&gt;

However, DW wisely prevents scripts from being embedded as either media or post content because XSS :)

But adding gist.github.com to a whitelist would enable coders of all skill levels to quickly post nicely formatted snippets of code for review, discussion, and comment.

Poll #11553 Enable Embedding GitHub Gists as Media in Posts
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 53


This suggestion:

View Answers

Should be implemented as-is.
13 (24.5%)

Should be implemented with changes. (please comment)
5 (9.4%)

Shouldn't be implemented.
5 (9.4%)

(I have no opinion)
30 (56.6%)

(Other: please comment)
0 (0.0%)

andrewducker: (Default)
[personal profile] andrewducker

Title:
Allow iframes for google maps embedding

Area:
posting

Summary:
Google Maps should be allowed to use iframes for embedding

Description:
I've noticed that YouTube iframe embeds are allowed. As this functionality exists, it should be extended to Google Maps as well.

Poll #7712 Allow iframes for google maps embedding
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 52


This suggestion:

View Answers

Should be implemented as-is.
19 (36.5%)

Should be implemented with changes. (please comment)
6 (11.5%)

Shouldn't be implemented.
0 (0.0%)

(I have no opinion)
27 (51.9%)

(Other: please comment)
0 (0.0%)

erik: A Chibi-style cartoon of me! (Default)
[personal profile] erik

Title:
Correct embedded content from syndicated LJ feeds

Area:
RSS

Summary:
Videos seem not to show up correctly in posts that are part of syndicated feeds from LJ.

Description:
When a community on LJ is syndicated here through RSS, any YouTube (and I assume other) videos posted on LJ are not visible on DW (At least to me). For instance:
http://vintage-ads-feed.dreamwidth.org/1360519.html
shows me a blank space (which seems to be the right size) instead of the video in Firefox and Chrome. But when I follow the link back to LJ, the video is shows up just fine in the same browser. And videos in other RSS feeds also show up correctly.

Poll #6497 Correct embedded content from syndicated LJ feeds
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 35


This suggestion:

View Answers

Should be implemented as-is.
16 (45.7%)

Should be implemented with changes. (please comment)
0 (0.0%)

Shouldn't be implemented.
3 (8.6%)

(I have no opinion)
15 (42.9%)

(Other: please comment)
1 (2.9%)

emperor: (Default)
[personal profile] emperor

Title:
Make youtube video URLs visible to non-flash users

Area:
entries

Summary:
It's perfectly possible to download and watch youtube videos without flash. However, the DW video embedder makes this impossible, as there's no mention of the video URL unless you have flash available. A comment in the source would be fine...

Description:
I don't have flash in my browser (because my computer is old, and flash plugins are dreadful), but I watch youtube videos using <a href="http://clive.sourceforge.net/">clive</a> (there are other options out there). I can't watch youtube videos people embed in their DW entries, without asking the poster to tell me the youtube URL.

It would be nice (and, I expect, fairly straightforward to code) if the embedder made the youtube URL available, either as a comment in the HTML code, or maybe via JS if no flash player is detected.

Poll #3835 Make youtube video URLs visible to non-flash users
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 52


This suggestion:

View Answers

Should be implemented as-is.
41 (78.8%)

Should be implemented with changes. (please comment)
7 (13.5%)

Shouldn't be implemented.
0 (0.0%)

(I have no opinion)
4 (7.7%)

(Other: please comment)
0 (0.0%)

Profile

Dreamwidth Suggestions

December 2018

S M T W T F S
      1
23 45678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Syndicate

RSS Atom