Make order on invite code list make sense

[yvi]

Title:
Make order on invite code list make sense

Area:
Invite codes frontend

Summary:
The order on http://www.dreamwidth.org/manage/invitecodes?full=1 is not optimal - make it so.

Description:
http://www.dreamwidth.org/manage/invitecodes?full=1 seems to have three tiers of order:

1. the unused codes
2. the used codes, ordered by date the person joined ascending
3. the used codes that were sent to someone via e-mail, ordered by date the person joined ascending

I suggest joining 2 and 3.

Poll #7730 Make order on invite code list make sense

Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 53

View Respondents

This suggestion:

View Answers

Should be implemented as-is.
36 (67.9%)

Should be implemented with changes. (please comment)
1 (1.9%)

Shouldn't be implemented.
1 (1.9%)

(I have no opinion)
15 (28.3%)

(Other: please comment)
0 (0.0%)

adding Ravelry to supported external sites for "magical" linking usernames

[anatsuno]

Title:
adding Ravelry to supported external sites for "magical" linking usernames

Area:
linking usernames (dreamwidth specific tag)

Summary:
What it says on the tin :D I would love it if we could add Ravelry.com to the sites supported so that I could write user name=anatsuno site=ravelry.com as a user thingie! Rav uses this structure for their user profiles: http://www.ravelry.com/people/anatsuno

Description:
I don't see what else to say... Except that I know Ravelry is mostly a memebers only site and the profile page aren't visible to non-members, yet I still think it is a worthy user tag to have... Because of the overlap in users in both sites' membership, if nothing else. :))

Poll #7731 adding Ravelry to supported external sites for "magical" linking usernames

Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 83

View Respondents

This suggestion:

View Answers

Should be implemented as-is.
61 (73.5%)

Should be implemented with changes. (please comment)
1 (1.2%)

Shouldn't be implemented.
1 (1.2%)

(I have no opinion)
20 (24.1%)

(Other: please comment)
0 (0.0%)