Customize Journal Style: separate and expand presentation, colors, fonts and images

[ninetydegrees]

Title:
Customize Journal Style: separate and expand presentation, colors, fonts and images

Area:
site, styles

Summary:
Presentation is grouped with mood themes and navigation strip in Display. Colors, fonts and images are grouped in Style. Separate them all into their own individual sections and fully expand the sections which aren't expanded by default (at least Fonts and Images).

Description:
It made sense to group sections together when there were few options but most styles now offer many customization possibilities and new options keep being added. I'd like to be able to change an image without having to systematically scroll all the way down and click on Expand all.

Poll #5112 Customize Journal Style: separate and expand presentation, colors, fonts and images

Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 36

View Respondents

This suggestion:

View Answers

Should be implemented as-is.
24 (66.7%)

Should be implemented with changes. (please comment)
0 (0.0%)

Shouldn't be implemented.
1 (2.8%)

(I have no opinion)
11 (30.6%)

(Other: please comment)
0 (0.0%)

"undo" in inbox, or maybe trash folder

[ratcreature]

Title:
"undo" in inbox, or maybe trash folder

Area:
inbox

Summary:
If you happen to delete a message you didn't want to delete there is no way to get it back that I know of. It would be nice if the inbox had an undo button, or if there was a trash folder that maybe kept deleted messages for a little while. (Maybe for a log-in session?)

Description:
On my laptop screen size in the inbox the "delete selected" button is not right of the "mark unread" but is fluidly put directly below the "mark read" button. Yesterday I selected a message and thanks to some sort of trackpad accident I clicked the "delete" rather than the "mark read" button above the delete (my trackpad is not as precise or responsive as I'd like sometimes, also tapping it functions as clicking, so accidents happen). There was no way to undo the accidental delete, or to recover the message from a trash folder or the like. It would be nice if this was possible.

Poll #5111 "undo" in inbox, or maybe trash folder

Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 68

View Respondents

This suggestion:

View Answers

Should be implemented as-is.
51 (75.0%)

Should be implemented with changes. (please comment)
9 (13.2%)

Shouldn't be implemented.
1 (1.5%)

(I have no opinion)
6 (8.8%)

(Other: please comment)
1 (1.5%)

Styles: remove the H3 heading for subject icons

[ninetydegrees]

Title:
Styles: remove the H3 heading for subject icons

Area:
styles

Summary:
Comment subjects are wrapped in H4 heading tags while comment subject icons are wrapped in H3 tags, as if they were a level above the comment subjects they go with. It makes little sense to me.

Description:
This is what the page organization looks like on custom comment pages:

H3: entry title/no 

   H4: comment title/no subject
H3: comment subject icon for the comment above

   H4: comment title/no subject

   H4: comment title/no subject

Is there even a point to having a heading tag for icons? There's no text at all (not even alt text).

Poll #5113 Styles: remove the H3 heading for subject icons

Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 37

View Respondents

This suggestion:

View Answers

Should be implemented as-is.
14 (37.8%)

Should be implemented with changes. (please comment)
1 (2.7%)

Shouldn't be implemented.
1 (2.7%)

(I have no opinion)
20 (54.1%)

(Other: please comment)
1 (2.7%)

Rephrase "Access to"

[yvi]

Title:
Rephrase "Access to"

Area:
profile page

Summary:
"Access To" is ambigious, let's rename it.

Description:
*Every* time I look at a profile page, I see the "Access to:" line and think it means "has access to" and not "gives access to" until i see the "access from" line below. Now maybe that's me not being a native speaker, but I think this is terribly confusing.

My suggestion would be to rename to "Gives Access To" and "Has Access From", which would get rid of the (perceived?) ambiguity.

Poll #5114 Rephrase "Access to"

Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 85

View Respondents

This suggestion:

View Answers

Should be implemented as-is.
80 (94.1%)

Should be implemented with changes. (please comment)
0 (0.0%)

Shouldn't be implemented.
0 (0.0%)

(I have no opinion)
5 (5.9%)

(Other: please comment)
0 (0.0%)