Your Layers page: sort by name instead of number

[ninetydegrees]

Title:
Your Layers page: sort by name instead of number

Area:
styles, customization

Summary:
On http://www.dreamwidth.org/customize/advanced/layers sort layers by name instead of number.

Description:
When you have a lot of layers, it's hell to find the one you're looking for because they're not sorted alphabetically.
To give you an example, Tabula Rasa is #47 and Modish is #113. Guess which one is first in the layer table? Please save me from carpal tunnel syndrome... ;)

ETA: per turlough's suggestion: also bold the current active layer(s) as on the styles page.

Poll #3235 Your Layers page: sort by name instead of number

Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 36

View Respondents

This suggestion:

View Answers

Should be implemented as-is.
19 (52.8%)

Should be implemented with changes. (please comment)
2 (5.6%)

Shouldn't be implemented.
0 (0.0%)

(I have no opinion)
14 (38.9%)

(Other: please comment)
1 (2.8%)

Your Layers page: redesign layers table as a tree

[ninetydegrees]

Title:
Your Layers page: redesign layers table as a tree

Area:
styles, customization

Summary:
Revamp http://www.dreamwidth.org/customize/advanced/layers so that layers are shown in a hierarchical tree with proper indentation and spacing.

Description:
The way the page is currently designed, I find it quite difficult to spot parent layers vs child layers because there is no indentation and the combination of table lines with no padding/spacing makes everything blur together. Colors might be useful as well.

ETA: per turlough's suggestion: bold the current active layer(s) as on the styles page.

Poll #3236 Your Layers page: redesign layers table as a tree

Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 41

View Respondents

This suggestion:

View Answers

Should be implemented as-is.
26 (63.4%)

Should be implemented with changes. (please comment)
0 (0.0%)

Shouldn't be implemented.
0 (0.0%)

(I have no opinion)
15 (36.6%)

(Other: please comment)
0 (0.0%)