Reading filters should work for mobile view

[burnishedvictory]

Title:
Reading filters should work for mobile view

Area:
mobile view, reading filters

Summary:
I would like to be able to use reading filters when I use mobile view.

Description:
Reading filters don't work when you're viewing your mobile reading page. It would be nice to be able to filter this page in the same way the normal reading page is filtered.

Poll #2526 Reading filters should work for mobile view

Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 61

View Respondents

This suggestion:

View Answers

Should be implemented as-is.
55 (90.2%)

Should be implemented with changes. (please comment)
0 (0.0%)

Shouldn't be implemented.
0 (0.0%)

(I have no opinion)
6 (9.8%)

(Other: please comment)
0 (0.0%)

truncated crossposts

[kaigou]

Title:
truncated crossposts

Area:
crossposting

Summary:
Add option to truncate posts when crossposted, so that entire post is not reproduced elsewhere.

Description:
Like many folks, I crosspost so non-DW people can see the entry on their flist, but I don't care for having the entirety of every post kept in multiple places. I'd much rather provide some kind of summary/entry section as teaser, and require that reading the rest means coming back to DW (which is also the only place I have comments turned on, as well).

Perhaps default be the first X number of characters, or stop at the cut (with cut being link to the DW post?). Which gets used would be dependent on which is programmatically easier. ETA: to clarify, this would be optional per post. You could crosspost as normal, with the entire thing going elsewhere, and then on the next post you could opt to truncate. [See comments from some other suggestions on how truncating might work.]

I'd be happy either way, so long as the objective of "only a little posted elsewhere, and must come to main (DW) journal to read the rest" is achieved.

Poll #2525 truncated crossposts

Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 75

View Respondents

This suggestion:

View Answers

Should be implemented as-is.
36 (48.0%)

Should be implemented with changes. (please comment)
16 (21.3%)

Shouldn't be implemented.
11 (14.7%)

(I have no opinion)
12 (16.0%)

(Other: please comment)
0 (0.0%)