![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[site community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/comm_staff.png)
Modify disable comments function
Title:
Modify disable comments function
Area:
entries
Summary:
1) Let journal owner see comments on entry where comments are disabled.
2) Provide option for disallowing future comments, while allowing current posts to remain visible.
Description:
People sometimes disable comments on an entry after comments have already been posted to the entry. People sometimes disable comments to their entire journal after people have made comments in it. While this is sometimes an effort to erase the record, more often, it is a signal from the journal owner to their audience that they do not wish any future comments.
1) I propose that the disable comments function, instead of making comments already made 'disappear', allow the journal owner to continue to see those comments. However, these comments should be presented without replyto links, and the replyto for each comment should redirect to the thread link. This will prevent the journal owner from repeatedly commenting to those who are no longer able to respond.
For a journal entry which is originally posted with comments disabled, the current behavior is preserved. For those journal owners who prefer the current behavior to the suggested behavior (i.e., they want disabling comments to prevent <em>them</em> from seeing comments already made) they can add this line to their customized css.
div.comments {visibility: hidden; speak: none; }
2) As I said, often disabling comments is not an attempt to hide prior discussion, but to stop future discussion. In certain circles in LJ, disabling comments on a contentious post is viewed as a cowardly coverup. Allowing past comments to remain visible to everyone able to the view entry, while disabling the replyto function, would let the historical record remain clear. Of course, the account which posted a comment should still have the ability to delete the comment, but they should not have the ability to *edit* any comments, even if they are paid users and the comment was never replied to.
This suggestion:
Should be implemented as-is.
15 (30.0%)
Should be implemented with changes.
30 (60.0%)
Shouldn't be implemented.
2 (4.0%)
(Other: please comment)
3 (6.0%)
no subject
I also want to make it so that people can choose to disable new comments on a post after X time, where X is what you choose, so you can say "only allow comments to my entries for two weeks" if you want, after which the old comments will still be visible but new comments or replies will be closed.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2009-07-14 10:13 am (UTC)(link)-C
no subject
no subject
no subject
For anti-spam/troll purposes, if this could be made journal-wide at the click of a button, it would be great.
no subject
I mean, with your proposed split, this can be effectively achieved by going back and mass-screening after you've closed comments, I suppose, but if one's doing it to a very active entry or a large portion of a journal, it seems a lot of work...
no subject
no subject
no subject
1) trolls going through my journal looking for any public entry anywhere just so they can comment on as many different posts as possible before I ban them;
2) F_W doing one of their "historical retrospectives" about some dumbass old HP controversy and people coming into old posts trying to start wankery up again.
The only thing I'd ever leave permanent open comments on is fic (for obvious reasons I think).
no subject
no subject
Some of my posts from a few years back still get occasional constructive comments, Google helps a lot more people out than the average journal author realises.
But overall, yes, I like this, but ZVI's idea of having the current comments disabled function still display them as screened to the author is a good one.
no subject
no subject
no subject