zvi: self-portrait: short, fat, black dyke in bunny slippers (Default)
still kind of a stealthy love ninja ([personal profile] zvi) wrote in [site community profile] dw_suggestions2009-08-17 12:27 pm

Add additional color specifications for anchor tags in Transmogrified

Title:
Add additional color specifications for anchor tags in Transmogrified

Area:
styles

Summary:
There are link color areas in Transmogrified which are not controlled through the wizard color options, but only via CSS. These links should be brought under wizard control.

Description:
The way the Transmogrified wizard currently works, color is only defined for links in the entries/comments, modules, header, and footer. Links which appear anywhere else use the browser's default, which is unpredictable and may result in completely invisible color combos.

The wizard should be changed for greater control. The simplest solution is to define the anchor and anchor visited colors for the whole page (probably next to where one chooses "page text color".)

Alternately, more wizard controls for the text in more places could be added, although there may be a negative trade-off because too many choices are overwhelming.

Anchor tags not controlled by the wizard, listed by 900degrees http://getting-started.dreamwidth.org/42407.html
.navigation .inner a (The forward/backward links at the top of the journal)
.page-tags .tags-container .ljtaglist a (the tags on the tags page)
.page-tags .manage-tags-link a (the manage tags link on the tags page)
.page-entry .bottomcomment a (the navigation at the bottom of an entry page)
.page-archive .month .footer .inner a; .page-archive .month .day-has-entries a; .page-month .month dt a; .page-month .month .entry-title a; .page-month .month .tag a (various links on the archive and month views)

Poll #1021 Add additional color specifications for anchor tags in Transmogrified
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 34


This suggestion:

View Answers

Should be implemented as-is.
27 (79.4%)

Should be implemented with changes.
0 (0.0%)

Shouldn't be implemented.
0 (0.0%)

(I have no opinion)
7 (20.6%)

(Other: please comment)
0 (0.0%)