Add "ao3.org" to the sites that get custom userheads when linking with "user" tags

[helens78]

Title:
Add "ao3.org" to the sites that get custom userheads when linking with "user" tags

Area:
entries

Summary:
We already have "archiveofourown.org" user links (ie, entering "user name=user site=archiveofourown.org" gets you a link to user's AO3 profile and works list), but "ao3.org" redirects to the same domain and would benefit from having a custom userhead as well.

Description:
It may seem like saving 12 characters isn't much, but allowing users to interchangeably use both functional domain names for the AO3 user links would help users prone to typos, save time, and shouldn't affect current functionality (in other words, please don't take the archiveofourown.org option away!).

Poll #8408 Add "ao3.org" to the sites that get custom userheads when linking with "user" tags

Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 49

View Respondents

This suggestion:

View Answers

Should be implemented as-is.
41 (83.7%)

Should be implemented with changes. (please comment)
0 (0.0%)

Shouldn't be implemented.
0 (0.0%)

(I have no opinion)
8 (16.3%)

(Other: please comment)
0 (0.0%)

Comments

[fu]

This will be available by the next code push ;-)

[denise]

Ha. Watch me know what we've already done when I go through the queue. :)

[fu]

I blame it on the code push being overloaded and way late -- lemme see what I can do to fix that...

[denise]

hee. you're too kind; *I* blame it on me being a space cadet :)

[fu]

Po-tay-to, space-faring po-tah-to... *handwave*

[jazzfish]

I /thought/ this one sounded familiar.

[musyc]

*clicks implement anyway because I hate seeing unanswered polls on this filter*

>.>

*slinks away*

[denise]

*g* you can just hit "answer" and it'll fill out the poll without recording a vote, for the record :)

[musyc]

Why, so it does. I shall remember that in future. However, if I didn't vote at all, it still says "change your vote". Does it on "view poll results" too, even if I didn't vote. Is that expected behavior?

[denise]

Yup; those code pathways aren't worth special-casing for whether you have a recorded vote or not.

[matgb]

And on top of what Denise says, once you've entered a null vote, going back to actually tick a box is changing your vote from null to a selection so it's correct regardless ;-)

(and my pedant brain is insisting I've got at least one term technically slightly wrong there but won't tell me what, but then it's been ten years since I had to know that stuff)

[zing_och]

Once I voted I can't "unvote" though - or am I missing something?

[matgb]

No, you're not. Well, not really. IIRC, there's a bug filed to allow that, and there are also some browser plugins that allow you to unselect a selection, so it's possible but not something currently easy.

[zing_och]

Ah, thank you! I was unsure because I remember seeing some discussion about it.

[denise]

radio buttons don't let you uncheck one once one's been checked, no. that's a html limitation.

[susanreads]

Oo! There's something I didn't know! No more feeling silly by voting on something that's already marked as a duplicate, then. (Unanswered polls look as if I missed something.)