matgb: Artwork of 19th century upper class anarchist, text: MatGB (Default)
Mat Bowles ([personal profile] matgb) wrote in [site community profile] dw_suggestions2010-09-18 04:38 pm

Allow crosspost footers to also be put in the footers of RSS feeds

Title:
Allow crosspost footers to also be put in the footers of RSS feeds

Area:
RSS

Summary:
The crosspost footer can be used in a more flexible way, by allowing it to be put at the base of posts that leave the site in other ways, such as RSS feeds.

ETA: NB, we're not talkinag about feeds syndicated to DW, we're talking about the RSS feeds our journals/comms release to other sites.

Description:
Many users use the crossposter to other sites, and look forward to it working with other platforms as well.

Others still have their content syndicated in some way, for example imported into Facebook notes or onto a Livejournal feed.

I have kept my notes import for Facebook coming from Livejournal, as that way the crosspost footer stays. In the comments to this suggestion:
http://dw-suggestions.dreamwidth.org/435390.html

it's come up that some people comment on syndicated content on Livejournal thinking it's going to go to the author, which is obviously not true. Allowing a footer displayed within the feed would help solve this problem.

Some sort of feed footer seems to be a fairly standard feature of other platforms, they definitely exist for some Blogger and Wordpress powered feeds I read, and this would definitely help cross site interoperability.

Drawbacks: Optional opt in, with wording editable by the user, apart from coding time and possible extra server load for the comment # image, I see none.

Poll #4510 Allow crosspost footers to also be put in the footers of RSS feeds
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 38


This suggestion:

View Answers

Should be implemented as-is.
22 (57.9%)

Should be implemented with changes. (please comment)
3 (7.9%)

Shouldn't be implemented.
1 (2.6%)

(I have no opinion)
12 (31.6%)

(Other: please comment)
0 (0.0%)

jadelennox: Senora Sabasa Garcia, by Goya (Default)

[personal profile] jadelennox 2010-09-22 03:57 pm (UTC)(link)
the outside sources pointed to by RSS feeds often change the methods/direct links to the "leave a comment" option. If I understand this correctly, you would be putting in a footer to the directly the comment option, and they would have to be the ability to change that. Would that have to be a support request? Sounds like a pain for support.
jadelennox: Senora Sabasa Garcia, by Goya (Default)

[personal profile] jadelennox 2010-09-22 04:08 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm talking about the RSS feeds our journals/comms release to other sites

Cap a h, sorry. I misunderstood, and my entire comment/question is based on me thinking that you were talking about the opposite -- having our RSS feeds that are syndicated to dreamwidth include a separate footer that points directly to comments or somesuch. Disregard, sorry.
kyrielle: painterly drawing of a white woman with large dark-blue-framed glasses, hazel eyes, brown hair, and a suspicious lack of blemishes (Default)

[personal profile] kyrielle 2010-09-23 04:42 am (UTC)(link)
My as-is vote is based on this comment - I originally read it the way [personal profile] jadelennox did - as something to be put onto the footers of inbound feeds syndicated onto Dreamwidth, not outbound feeds others might have in their readers. It makes a lot more sense with this explanation, which may be worth editing into the post.
zvi: self-portrait: short, fat, black dyke in bunny slippers (Default)

[personal profile] zvi 2010-09-23 03:11 am (UTC)(link)
I'm not understanding why this would be opt-in, instead of the default?

I also don't understand how it's different from the existing bug in bugzilla.
zvi: self-portrait: short, fat, black dyke in bunny slippers (Default)

[personal profile] zvi 2010-09-23 10:55 am (UTC)(link)
Add comment image to RSS feed. I assumed that the comment count image would link to the comments, so I guess you theoretically could satisfy that bug without adding a reply link, but it would be ... weird.