![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[site community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/comm_staff.png)
Variation of "Tropospherical" Site Scheme
Title:
Variation of "Tropospherical" Site Scheme
Area:
site schemes
Summary:
I'd like a variation of the "Tropospherical" site scheme in colours that are easier on the eyes.
Description:
As it happens, the default site scheme has always been the one that I liked best. However, "best" in this case means "just about bearable" because I absolutely can't stand the colours. I love everything else about it, but those particular shades of red and purple both make me cringe - especially in combination with that light grey background.
Vertical navigation confuses me to no end, so switching to Celerity is not an option for me. I really like the colours of that one, though. A plain, white background and a shade of green that's easy on the eyes - awesome!
It would be neat if there was a version of Tropospherical that had a white background as well, maybe combined with a similarly muted colour as Celerity - it doesn't have to be green; I'd suggest blue or brown, for example. Even the default red would look better without the grey.
I'm curious - does anybody actually *like* these schemes as they are?? Could one of them perhaps be replaced? If not, what do you think about adding a third option? I know I'm not the only one who has a problem with the colours; I've come across several comments by random people complaining about them off-handedly.
This suggestion:
Should be implemented as-is.
28 (56.0%)
Should be implemented with changes. (please comment)
8 (16.0%)
Shouldn't be implemented.
0 (0.0%)
(I have no opinion)
13 (26.0%)
(Other: please comment)
1 (2.0%)
no subject
Here's her LJ post on trying DW again which doesn't go into detail, but has three other people in comments describing similar problems.
Here's the thread on her DW post about layouts and site schemes, in which she and
I've seen complaints about the default site scheme, on the level of "this is why I can't move there", come up before; those were just the ones I could easily link to. (I personally have grown quite fond of Tropo Red, but I have to confess that if there was a more boring scheme I would probably jump on it.)
ETA: and I agree about visited links, too - I keep a special bookmarklet just so I can strip out all the styling when I'm working through a long list of links, but it would be really nice if I didn't have to.
no subject
I try telling people that if they set up an OpenID they can view all journal pages in their own style without having a regular account, but honestly that is a huge barrier to participation. Only very few people think setting up their own style is fun.
no subject
no subject
no subject
I'm mostly asking out of a desire to get more people to join DW by now. :) Personally I'm planning to experiment with the bookmarklets that somebody linked to for a while, and maybe I'll even give Stylish a go one of these days ...
no subject
Adding more colors, sure, although we want to minimize the number of choices people have to make; more options are generally bad UI. We do already have a few other site schemes, available under the Display tab of Account Settings.
no subject