![[staff profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user_staff.png)
![[site community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/comm_staff.png)
Autoresponder for private messages
Title:
Autoresponder for private messages
Area:
notifications, inbox, private messaging
Summary:
Allow people to write an autoresponse text that's sent out when someone PMs them.
Description:
I don't read my private messages on this account very often at *all*, mostly because I'm subscribed to all comments on about 20 different communities and my inbox fills up rapidly -- so I just don't use it. This leads to people PMing me because they need support with Dreamwidth, or have a DW-related question, and then the message languishes in my inbox until the next time I go to clean it out. If I don't reply to a PM the minute it hits my email, I often lose it entirely (or have it eaten by running over my upper boundary of inbox items, which happens in roughly two weeks or so), and then people think I'm horrible and ignoring them and it's bad all around.
Part of this is obviously my fault for not replying to things immediately upon receiving them, but I'd really like to be able to set up an autoresponder for people who PM me, giving them my standard redirects for the best places to go and get help with DW.
Autoresponders would work like email autoresponders do: if you have autorespond enabled, when someone sends a PM, it would reply with your autorespond message (customizable). To minimize annoyances, autoresponse messages would only be sent once per contact per $timelength (I'm thinking something like "only send autoresponse once per week", so if someone PMs you every day, they'd only get the autoresponse on day 1, day 8, day 15, etc) and autoresponses would not trigger an autoresponse (so, if someone PMed you, your account autoresponded, and they had autorespond configured, you wouldn't receive their autoresponse).
This suggestion:
Should be implemented as-is.
33 (61.1%)
Should be implemented with changes. (please comment)
14 (25.9%)
Shouldn't be implemented.
2 (3.7%)
(I have no opinion)
5 (9.3%)
(Other: please comment)
0 (0.0%)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Fab idea!
no subject
I presume it would not be shown to people who are not allowed to send you a message? Or perhaps should it be different for people who are not allowed to send you a message?
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject