tenkuu: Tenkuu no Touma (Default)
tenkuu ([personal profile] tenkuu) wrote in [site community profile] dw_suggestions2010-04-08 02:52 am

No rename token for purged communities

Title:
No rename token for purged communities

Area:
communities, rename tokens

Summary:
A purged username that someone wants to use as a community should not require a rename token.

Description:
Communities shouldn't need rename tokens because they're not a newly created username like someone would have for their own personal journal. Once purged, if a username can be used as a community, it should be as easy to claim it as for any newly created community. After all, purged should mean that it no longer has any association with its previous owner, and in this way it's like any regular unclaimed username.

Poll #2674 No rename token for purged communities
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 47


This suggestion:

View Answers

Should be implemented as-is.
6 (12.8%)

Should be implemented with changes. (please comment)
1 (2.1%)

Shouldn't be implemented.
32 (68.1%)

(I have no opinion)
8 (17.0%)

(Other: please comment)
0 (0.0%)

yvi: Kaylee half-smiling, looking very pretty (Default)

[personal profile] yvi 2010-04-10 07:23 am (UTC)(link)
When you try to register a purged username, yes, you are.
yvi: Kaylee half-smiling, looking very pretty (Default)

[personal profile] yvi 2010-04-10 07:48 am (UTC)(link)
Okay, I really don't get your point then.
yvi: Kaylee half-smiling, looking very pretty (Default)

[personal profile] yvi 2010-04-10 08:21 am (UTC)(link)
Yes, but you specifically single out communities. I don't get that line of reasoning.
yvi: Kaylee half-smiling, looking very pretty (Default)

[personal profile] yvi 2010-04-11 09:00 am (UTC)(link)
Not specifically, no.

Seriously? The whole suggestion is titled "No rename token for purged communities", you said "Communities shouldn't need rename tokens because they're not a newly created username like someone would have for their own personal journal" and "Because a community does not work the same as a regular username".

I am letting this go now, but let me say that you did not, in my opinion, make clear what you meant.
azurelunatic: Vivid pink Alaskan wild rose. (Default)

[personal profile] azurelunatic 2010-04-12 07:40 am (UTC)(link)
If anything, for this suggestion to make sense, it would be "Purged usernames that were previously used as a community should be freely available, because communities do not leave comments nor do they have old entries in other communities".
yvi: Kaylee half-smiling, looking very pretty (Default)

[personal profile] yvi 2010-04-12 09:20 am (UTC)(link)
*nods* I didn't think of that, but yes, that might have made sense.