pocketmouse: pocketmouse default icon: abstract blue (Default)
pocketmouse ([personal profile] pocketmouse) wrote in [site community profile] dw_suggestions2010-03-22 12:55 pm

Tag filtering on Subscription filters should be organized alphabetically

Title:
Tag filtering on Subscription filters should be organized alphabetically

Area:
subscription filters

Summary:
The option to filter by tag on subscription filters is currently not organized in any recognizable fashion; this should be corrected.

Description:
Right now, when I want to filter out a certain tag or tag group from one of my subscription filters, I have to search for the specific tags visually or using ctrl-f, the tags aren't listed in any recognizable order. If they could be auto-sorted by some intuitive system, like usage or (preferably) alphabetically, that would would make removing tags much easier.

Poll #2524 Tag filtering on Subscription filters should be organized alphabetically
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 36


This suggestion:

View Answers

Should be implemented as-is.
31 (86.1%)

Should be implemented with changes. (please comment)
0 (0.0%)

Shouldn't be implemented.
0 (0.0%)

(I have no opinion)
5 (13.9%)

(Other: please comment)
0 (0.0%)

foxfirefey: Dreamwidth: social content with dimension. (dreamwidth)

[personal profile] foxfirefey 2010-03-23 06:21 pm (UTC)(link)
So, your suggestion is totally already migrated into the database:

http://bugs.dwscoalition.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2012

At some point it will be implemented, someone just has to take it up.
denise: Image: Me, facing away from camera, on top of the Castel Sant'Angelo in Rome (Default)

[staff profile] denise 2010-03-23 06:44 pm (UTC)(link)
Whups! My mistake; I didn't realize this was a dupe.
foxfirefey: Fox stealing an egg. (mischief)

[personal profile] foxfirefey 2010-03-23 06:49 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, you're only close to omniscience.
foxfirefey: A fox colored like flame over an ornately framed globe (Default)

[personal profile] foxfirefey 2010-03-23 09:50 pm (UTC)(link)
Don't feel bad about it--you're not the only one who missed it. The only reason I know about it so well is that I briefly looked into doing it but didn't feel like I had the mental bandwidth to solve it at the time.