msilverstar: (Default)
msilverstar ([personal profile] msilverstar) wrote in [site community profile] dw_suggestions2010-02-22 10:14 pm

Improve comment preview with metadata and post text

Title:
Improve comment preview with metadata and post text

Area:
entries

Summary:
The preview needs more context: I need to see what I'm commenting on! Security status if nothing else.

Description:
I previewed a comment, and then had to open a new tab to find out whether I was commenting on a locked post. I could easily have said something wayyyy too personal on a public post.

The Preview would be much better if it showed context. I think it should at least include the security status and original subject, and maybe the icon, location, music, and mood.

Better yet would be to include the first few lines of the actual post and then a JavaScript accordion-type expansion for the rest of the post. If there are cut-tags, include those for navigation, expanding the post starting from there.

For replies to other comments, the standard links for "Parent" and "Thread from start" would be really helpful, again, for context.

Poll #2336 Improve comment preview with metadata and post text
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 36


This suggestion:

View Answers

Should be implemented as-is.
13 (36.1%)

Should be implemented with changes. (please comment)
6 (16.7%)

Shouldn't be implemented.
4 (11.1%)

(I have no opinion)
13 (36.1%)

(Other: please comment)
0 (0.0%)

cheyinka: a spoof of an iPod ad, featuring a Metroid with iPod earbuds pressed against each of its 3 internal organs (iMetroid iScree)

[personal profile] cheyinka 2010-02-25 04:13 pm (UTC)(link)
"With changes": I don't like the "better yet" option (seems like too much clutter) but I think having original subject and security visible would be very helpful.
chagrined: Marvel comics: zombie!Spider-Man, holding playing cards, saying "Brains?" (brains?)

[personal profile] chagrined 2010-02-25 04:45 pm (UTC)(link)
I like this one, though if it could be expanded too, I'd probably also like that fine.

I'd vote against having a ton of information display without needing to expand it, because I personally would find that distracting and a lot to scroll through when I'm trying to proof-read my own comment. (But if it were just security level & subject, or if the other information had to be expanded to view, then I'm for it.)
instantramen: a woman with black hair and white skin pouring water from a kettle (Default)

[personal profile] instantramen 2010-02-25 05:53 pm (UTC)(link)
+1
zvi: self-portrait: short, fat, black dyke in bunny slippers (Default)

[personal profile] zvi 2010-02-25 06:55 pm (UTC)(link)
+1
matgb: Artwork of 19th century upper class anarchist, text: MatGB (Default)

[personal profile] matgb 2010-02-25 11:45 pm (UTC)(link)
I dislike, for two reasons. 1 being that commenting on someone else's locked post gives them control, if you don't want the info made public they can still do so if they unlock.

2 being that I always check the status of a post before I hit comment anyway, not that it makes a huge difference, I tend to assume anything I write on someone else's place is under their control as per 1 above.

I'm not vehemently opposed, but I don't see the point. Then I rarely use preview, annoys me too much.
mllesays: art from spider-women agent of s.w.o.r.d. (c-mu // checking the s.w.o.r.d. iphone)

[personal profile] mllesays 2010-03-05 11:40 pm (UTC)(link)
I could easily have said something wayyyy too personal on a public post.

Could be taken to mean something personal about the person who made the original post, not just the commenter. For instance, accidentally calling someone by their real name in the comment on a public post.

Just another perspective...
matgb: Artwork of 19th century upper class anarchist, text: MatGB (Default)

[personal profile] matgb 2010-03-06 01:01 am (UTC)(link)
And one I hadn't thought of. I gues I just don't relate, I pretty much always know what security level a post is, and also rarely if ever use preview (the original comment editing spec for LJ was mine, because I hate previewing but sometimes typo, etc).

But thanks, that does actually make more sense--I respect the desires of others to remain pseudonymous, even if I think it's a mugs game, and I could easily do that.