![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[site community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/comm_staff.png)
Revamp Community Members page
Title:
Revamp Community Members page
Area:
community administration
Summary:
As thelittlevoice explained in their <a href="http://community.livejournal.com/suggestions/972888.html">LiveJournal suggestion</a> the members page is completely unpractical once you get a certain number of members. Let's think of ways to improve it.
Description:
Here are my suggestions for improving this page:
- Add at least one other column: joined date. I'm sure some admins would like other stats like latest post, latest comment, number of posts, number of comments.
- Make search work for names starting with, ending with, containing 'x', not just *exact* names. Make it possible to search for members having joined between two dates. Display the results instead of loading the whole page they're in.
- Let admins filter the page by capability: admins, moderates, has unmoderated posting access, has posting access, etc. and vice-versa and any combination of these.
- Let admins filter the page by account status: active, suspended, deleted. Maybe add the list of banned members too.
- Change the way pagination is displayed so that you don't get dozens or hundreds of page links when you have lots of members. Maybe something like 1 to 10 then you have to click on 10 or 'more' to get 10 to 20, and of course links to easily jump to the first page or the last one.
ETA: see Kyrielle's comment for an even better pagination system.
- Allow the pagination to be alphabetical instead of purely numerical. It would be awesome it this were adaptive so that you have a minimum and a maximum numbers of names on one page (it would group letters together or, on the opposite, break the list down to Aa or Aaa).
ETA2: Also see Poulpette's comment for the integration of invitations into this page.
Anything else?
This suggestion:
Should be implemented as-is.
16 (66.7%)
Should be implemented with changes. (please comment)
3 (12.5%)
Shouldn't be implemented.
0 (0.0%)
(I have no opinion)
5 (20.8%)
(Other: please comment)
0 (0.0%)
no subject
So if you're on page 22 you might see (as linked items and better done than this):
1 2 ... 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ... 208 209
(And if you see that, I am hiding. *grins* But, for the sake of example.)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject