"View Respondents" in poll results in chronologically-based order

[kate_nepveu]

Title:
"View Respondents" in poll results in chronologically-based order

Area:
entries

Summary:
The new "View Respondents" options for polls is awesome, but the respondents don't seem to be listed in any obvious order, making it hard to tell what responses are new. They should be listed in reverse-chronological order (and noted to be in that order), and possibly marked with datestamps as well.

Description:
I have a rotten memory for usernames, so placing the respondents in a chronologically-based order would mean I only had to expand the new responses rather than try to remember who already responded and end up expanding all of them.

Poll #9494 "View Respondents" in poll results in chronologically-based order

Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 55

View Respondents

This suggestion:

View Answers

Should be implemented as-is.
31 (56.4%)

Should be implemented with changes. (please comment)
11 (20.0%)

Shouldn't be implemented.
0 (0.0%)

(I have no opinion)
13 (23.6%)

(Other: please comment)
0 (0.0%)

Comments

[azurelunatic]

I would like that as default, and the shiny with bells on, I would like it to be able to sort by response to a question.

(If that would be difficult to do, it would be nice to have a csv file with a reasonable structure so that a local spreadsheet program could do the sorting instead.)

[denise]

http://bugs.dwscoalition.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28 :)

[azurelunatic]

\o/

Okay, my with-changes is now "and optionally organize by answers to any arbitrary question on-site, if that's not too much hassle".

[kerravonsen]

+1

[montuos]

+1

[pseudomonas]

Only quibble - for anonymous polls datestamping could be a bad idea since it's that bit more data leakage that can allow deanonymization. Otherwise - fine.

[kate_nepveu]

Good point! I shall vote for my own suggestion "with changes" now. =>

[kerravonsen]

+1

[montuos]

+1

[yvi]

(Note that I suppose they are ordered by userid. Not that that would help anyone ;))

[kate_nepveu]

=>

(It really is an awesome feature! I wouldn't have these suggestions if I weren't, you know, using it!)

[denise]

I looked into it a bit last week (I think from a support request kate_nepveu submitted? something like that, at least) and it is, indeed, by userid. :)

[kate_nepveu]

Wasn't me, but thanks for the information!

[denise]

huh! Well, it was a support request or comment-in-official-journal from someone. I just have a shit memory for usernames. *G*

[kate_nepveu]

Oh, me too.

(Is anyone, perchance, working on adding the functionality of LJ's "notes" feature?)

[denise]

Yup! yvi has been working on the project for a while, and her version is really sexy.

[kate_nepveu]

Woo!

[kaberett]

I always get a bit squirmy when you say things like that, JSYK.

(my "with changes" is EVERYTHING IN THE COMMENTS)