little_terror: (Default)
草鹿 やちる「KUSAJISHI YACHIRU」 ([personal profile] little_terror) wrote in [site community profile] dw_suggestions2012-02-05 08:38 pm

Fluid width content on entry pages

Title:
Fluid width content on entry pages

Area:
styles, entries, usability

Summary:
Fluid width content on entry pages to improve usability and readability.

Description:
At the moment, DW only seems to provide fixed content on default/unstyled entry pages. Because of the fixed content parameters, overwhelming whitespace can be an issue for larger monitors and computers running higher resolutions. Moreover, long comment threads end up "shrinking" very quickly, necessitating users to click more links (such as thread or expand) in order to view content.

Fluid width for entry pages would decrease the amount of uncomfortable whitespace users running higher resolutions encounter. Fluid width would also prevent long comment threads from shrinking too quickly and decrease the amount of clicking users are required to do at present.

Implementation of fluid width should not be difficult, as the style sheet that currently powers the default entry style only needs to have fluid width coded into style containers.

In conclusion, fluid width would improve usability and readability across platform and resolution. I hope the DW development team considers this suggestion!

Poll #9492 Fluid width content on entry pages
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 51


This suggestion:

View Answers

Should be implemented as-is.
10 (19.6%)

Should be implemented with changes. (please comment)
5 (9.8%)

Shouldn't be implemented.
20 (39.2%)

(I have no opinion)
13 (25.5%)

(Other: please comment)
3 (5.9%)

sky: (ph - break star)

[personal profile] sky 2012-02-22 03:33 pm (UTC)(link)
This would be a godsend. This has been pretty much my #1 pet peeve on DW ever since my first day here three years ago. I have a userstyle set up to stretch Tropo comment pages for most of the length of my screen (1366x768 widescreen) but I'd much prefer to have the functionality baked in.