It used to be, back when bandwidth was one of the most expensive things a site had to worry about.
These days, a tiny favicon is such a tiny image that most sites'd barely notice it was happening.
Hotlinking a large image or similar wihtout permission would still be a bad thing, but a small filesize icon, that's likely to get cached quickly, shouldn't be an issue.
no subject
It used to be, back when bandwidth was one of the most expensive things a site had to worry about.
These days, a tiny favicon is such a tiny image that most sites'd barely notice it was happening.
Hotlinking a large image or similar wihtout permission would still be a bad thing, but a small filesize icon, that's likely to get cached quickly, shouldn't be an issue.