kellan (
kellan_the_tabby) wrote in
dw_suggestions2010-03-24 11:55 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[site community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/comm_staff.png)
Entry tags:
RSS Feed Search
Title:
RSS Feed Search
Area:
Feeds
Summary:
It'd be awful nice to have a way to _search_ for a feed, instead of scanning through the list (http://www.dreamwidth.org/syn/list.bml).
Description:
I know you can sort the feed by feed title, and that _does_ help, but there are still some that aren't named what you might expect, and it's a lot to slog through. A simple search box (okay, it might not be simple, I'm no programmer) would make finding feeds a lot easier.
Poll #2541 RSS Feed Search
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 51
This suggestion:
View Answers
Should be implemented as-is.
44 (86.3%)
Should be implemented with changes. (please comment)
1 (2.0%)
Shouldn't be implemented.
0 (0.0%)
(I have no opinion)
6 (11.8%)
(Other: please comment)
0 (0.0%)
no subject
no subject
I don't know if it would be useful enough, but I can see where just using the feed URL would be insufficient in some cases (I've encountered them before, and carried on wondering if I just created a duplicate feed or not).
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
though it would be nice to have a way to search all feeds, which are public by default. This would be particularly good for new topics where I don't know which feeds might be good, for example RaceFail or 3D. I would be more interested in a feed chosen by a DW user than ye random site or twitter link.
no subject
no subject
I think Dreamwidth should just plain make content more discoverable. It should be easy to find journals, feeds, and especially individual posts that pertain to a search query.
Dreamwidth is all about reading and writing, after all. It's just that it's easier right now to write on Dreamwidth than to find something to read (or to find someone to read what you write).
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject