Means that if I want to rename ICONA, I could do: "great, huge, vast," but NOT "great, huge, vast, spacious" if I want to retain the link between ICONA and the existing or edited keywords?
Yes, that's what I mean; I am not 100% certain this is true, however, as I didn't test it much and mostly just looked at the sourcecode.
However, in my understanding you could, in that example, solve the problem by renaming to "great, huge, vast", which would map:
big -> great
tall -> huge
grand -> vast
and then add the 'spacious' keyword, which is obviously used nowhere.
I think the problem with having different numbers of keywords starts when you have 3 keywords and want to rename to 2 - how do you map that? Though as soon as that feature goes live I will make a suggestion to make renaming to 1 keyword possible. That would greatly reduce the clutter for some people.
no subject
Yes, that's what I mean; I am not 100% certain this is true, however, as I didn't test it much and mostly just looked at the sourcecode.
However, in my understanding you could, in that example, solve the problem by renaming to "great, huge, vast", which would map:
big -> great
tall -> huge
grand -> vast
and then add the 'spacious' keyword, which is obviously used nowhere.
I think the problem with having different numbers of keywords starts when you have 3 keywords and want to rename to 2 - how do you map that? Though as soon as that feature goes live I will make a suggestion to make renaming to 1 keyword possible. That would greatly reduce the clutter for some people.