Alex ([personal profile] alexbayleaf) wrote in [site community profile] dw_suggestions 2012-07-03 03:29 am (UTC)

I was also going to point out that it was an international standard, and one that (IMHO) should be more widely used, not only because it avoids the US-vs-most-other-places month/day ordering confusion, but also because when you consistently use dates in this format, they sort correctly when you have a list of them! Not that it's relevant in this case, but consider the situation where you have files named things like:

Backups-Apr2012.zip
Backups-Feb2012.zip
Backups-Jan2012.zip
Backups-Mar2012.zip

(Sorted alphabetically, as you can see.)

I always prefer to name things eg.

Backups-2012-01-01.zip
Backups-2012-02-01.zip
Backups-2012-03-01.zip
Backups-2012-04-01.zip

As I said, this is not relevant to the current discussion, apart from being a general argument in favour of ISO-8601 and its variants.

Then again, give me half a chance and I'll lecture you enthusiastically about why A-series paper (A4 etc) is the Best Thing Ever because of SCIENCE.

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org