aedifica: Me with my hair as it is in 2020: long, with blue tips (Default)
aedifica ([personal profile] aedifica) wrote in [site community profile] dw_suggestions2009-10-29 03:09 pm

Half-anonymous commenting: commenter must leave name but doesn't have to log in

Title:
Half-anonymous commenting: commenter must leave name but doesn't have to log in

Area:
Comments by non-Dreamwidth users

Summary:
A comment-posting option that does not require the commenter to be logged in but does require the commenter to leave a name or handle.

Description:
Problem to be solved: A lot of people I know on LJ haven't gotten the hang of this OpenID thing and use the "anonymous" option instead when commenting on Dreamwidth entries. However, these commenters who use the "anonymous" option often forget to sign their comments, which bugs me because I want to know who the comment is from. Yet I don't want to turn off anonymous commenting altogether, because I want my LJ friends to be able to comment on my Dreamwidth entries.

Proposed solution (two parts):

1. Create a new level of authentication for comments, where no login is required but there is a text box labeled "Name" that requires input before the comment can be submitted.

2. Add this new option to the choices Dreamwidth users already have for what level of comments to allow on their journals (the option is on the Manage Account page, Privacy tab). Current choices are to allow comments from Everybody, Registered Accounts, Access List, or Nobody.

Possible drawbacks: I can't think of any unless this would be a complicated thing to code.

Alternatively, I suggest something identical to this but with a box for Name and a second box for Email Address instead of just the one box for Name. Once the comment is posted, the email address used would not be visible to anyone except the journal owner, like how IP address tracking works already. In practice this option would be like what a lot of blogs use for comments.

Possible drawbacks to the alternate option: This option seems like it would be more complicated to code because of hiding the email address, but that might be easier than I think it would because something similar is already in place for IP addresses.

Poll #1560 Half-anonymous commenting: commenter must leave name but doesn't have to log in
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 35


This suggestion:

View Answers

Should be implemented as-is.
16 (45.7%)

Should be implemented with changes. (please comment)
4 (11.4%)

Shouldn't be implemented.
4 (11.4%)

(I have no opinion)
4 (11.4%)

(Other: please comment)
7 (20.0%)

cesy: "Cesy" - An old-fashioned quill and ink (Default)

[personal profile] cesy 2009-10-29 08:20 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm pretty sure something along these lines is already planned.
cesy: "Cesy" - An old-fashioned quill and ink (Default)

[personal profile] cesy 2009-10-29 08:24 pm (UTC)(link)
No, it was in Bugzilla before Suggestions was started. Bug 759.
yvi: Kaylee half-smiling, looking very pretty (Default)

[personal profile] yvi 2009-10-29 08:28 pm (UTC)(link)
And I'd rather have it implemented as in #759 than have a different security level for signed anon comments.
denise: Image: Me, facing away from camera, on top of the Castel Sant'Angelo in Rome (Default)

[staff profile] denise 2009-10-29 08:25 pm (UTC)(link)
I let it through because I wanted to see what people came up with.
charmian: a snowy owl (Default)

[personal profile] charmian 2009-10-29 08:33 pm (UTC)(link)
I definitely think making commenting for non-registered users easier would be great. A place to put in web site, should the commenter desire that, would also be good!
kerravonsen: (Default)

[personal profile] kerravonsen 2009-10-29 08:57 pm (UTC)(link)
+1
erinptah: (Default)

[personal profile] erinptah 2009-10-29 09:21 pm (UTC)(link)
+1
gchick: Small furry animal wearing a tin-foil hat (Default)

[personal profile] gchick 2009-10-29 08:39 pm (UTC)(link)
I voted "other" on this one because of the existing spec, but I want to make it clear that I'm vastly in favor of it happening in one version or another.
sedge: A drawing of the head of a sedge wren. (Default)

[personal profile] sedge 2009-10-29 08:53 pm (UTC)(link)
+1
the_shoshanna: Dreamsheep holding a spork, w/ text "sheepSPORK" (sheepspork)

[personal profile] the_shoshanna 2009-10-29 11:03 pm (UTC)(link)
+1
susanreads: my avatar, a white woman with brown hair and glasses (Default)

[personal profile] susanreads 2009-10-29 11:34 pm (UTC)(link)
+1
kaigou: this is what I do, darling (source code)

[personal profile] kaigou 2009-10-29 10:52 pm (UTC)(link)
plus infinity for whatever variation gets used, so long as it can style itself as close as possible to the web's existing standards. (see wordpress, joomla, drupal, and any of the other hundreds of blog-like apps that ask name & email.)
kyrielle: painterly drawing of a white woman with large dark-blue-framed glasses, hazel eyes, brown hair, and a suspicious lack of blemishes (Default)

[personal profile] kyrielle 2009-10-29 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)
+1 for existing spec and one note, the existing spec suggests email address and sending emails to it (allowing enable/disable after the first). In which case, anonymous users filling in that field should be able to check/uncheck a "send replies to my email" box - I don't care which way it defaults, but there ought to be a choice.
triadruid: Apollo and the Raven, c. 480 BC , Pistoxenus Painter  (Default)

[personal profile] triadruid 2009-10-30 03:46 pm (UTC)(link)
It sounds like some tighter integration between OpenID and DreamWidth would satisfy what you're looking for. I agree with the above comments that just requiring a 'name' (that's Mr. hjgghdfhdt to you!) won't help anything.

[personal profile] swaldman 2009-11-03 09:37 am (UTC)(link)
Depends on the problem you're trying to solve.
I get a lot of anonymous comments where somebody has clearly intended to put their name at the bottom but has forgotten, and where they pop back 10 minutes later and post again saying "oh, that was Fred, by the way".

This would be valuable to have implemented. The need for it would also be reduced by making the process of setting up an openID-based account a lot more obvious... most of my LJ-based friends are confused by this.